VISTAS articles are made available for historical reference only and are presented "as is." ACA does not guarantee or represent that the information is current, accurate or indicative of the original or intended quality. These materials are not maintained or updated and may contain outdated or incomplete information. Readers should exercise discretion and verify information independently before relying on it. We assume no responsibility for the use or interpretation of this content.
Possible Selves
Concepts, Applications, and Implications for Career Practice and Policy
NCDA Conference, July 9-11, 2008 Washington, DC
Career Transitions
School-to-work transitions are a major developmental challenge facing young people (Arnett, 2006; Blustein, 2006)
Given societal shifts, impact of a global economy, & increasing emphasis on technological literacy, youth must participate early & actively in career planning
Current labour market trends indicate most workers will need to consider new employment options and pathways throughout careers
Social Constructivist and Social Cognitive Career Theories
Individuals are active agents in their development (Blustein, 2006; Savickas, 1995)
Development is contextual in nature
Multidimensional relations exist between individuals and their multiple worlds (social, school, family, etc.)
“Selves” are socially constructed and maintained in narrative and in context
SCCT: Four variables influence career behavior: behaviors, self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, & goals (Lent, Hackett, & Brown, 1999)
Cultural context impacts the variables
Cultural Diversity
Culture comprises “those understandings and ways of understanding that are judged to be characteristic of a discernable group” (Chambers, 2000, p.852)
Pedersen (1991) views cultural, demographic, and personal constructs as differentiating minority from dominant culture. Culture denotes socially-constructed differences
In our work we consider gender, age, ethnicity, place, rural/urban residence, and other factors to be examples of cultural differences
e.g., the socio-historical experience of First Nations populations & the impact of Indian residential school system make it challenging for First Nations youth
Self Maps
Are concrete representations of self
Provide a perspective on the self, including supports, strengths, obstacles
Provide both macroscopic and microscopic views of the individual
Act as permanent records that allow the creators to return for review & revision
Possible Selves
“Possible selves” is a future-oriented and personalized form of self-concept that links to motivation (Markus & Nurius, 1986)
Possible Selves represent the hopes, dreams and fears of people considering their future
Construction of possible selves involves using imagination and reflection to create a set of
hoped-for,
expected, and
feared future selves
Possible Selves Mapping
Generates hopes & fears for the future
Develops understanding and appreciation of personal values
Connects current activities with hopes and fears for the future
Identifies factors that affect sense of self and personal potential
Increases motivation
Marshall & Guenette (2008) DVD & manual
Seven steps in the Possible Selves Mapping Process
Creating a Possible Selves Brainstorm Map. Brainstorming hoped for and feared possible selves (on a brainstorm map or paper)
Grouping and naming the hoped for & feared selves
Debriefing the brainstorm map
Identifying most likely, least likely and most wanted hoped for selves and feared selves
Transferring brainstorm information to overview map
“Things to do right now.” Exploring how to achieve or avoid various hopes and fears
Overall impressions, thoughts & feedback
Step 1. Creating a Possible Selves Brainstorm Map
Introduce the concepts
Give participants green and yellow post-it sticky notes (or file cards)
Invite participant to write as many hoped for selves as possible, one per note – then do the same for feared selves
Encourage them to be bold and to include dreams and “long shots”
Step 2. Grouping Hoped for and Feared Selves
Have participant arrange hoped for and feared selves into groups or categories and to give each group a name or title
Groups may have mixed hopes & fears, or may be all hopes or all fears
Step 3. Debriefing the Brainstorm Map
Have the participant explain how and why they have categorized and arranged their selves
Ask what led them to choose that grouping, or that name, etc.
They may change or add selves as they explain the map – this is fine
Step 4. Identifying Most Likely & Most Wanted or Feared Selves
Ask participant to work with hoped for selves – choosing which hoped for self is most likely to occur (place a box around this one), least likely to occur (place a circle around this one), and the hoped for self they really want (place a star beside this one) – these may overlap
Do the same with feared selves
Step 5. Transferring Brainstorm to the Possible Selves Overview Map
Transfer most likely (square), least likely (circle) and most wanted (star) hoped for self to the Overview map
Do the same for the fears
Facilitate exploration and discussion with open questions and curiosity (e.g., what led you to … and how do you feel about that …)
Possible Selves Map
Step 6. Things to do right now
Connect or “anchor” their hopes and fears to behaviours, e.g., For most likely to happen hope: What are some things you can do right now to ensure this hoped for self will happen?
Least likely hope: What are some things you can do right now if you want to give this hope more of a chance?
Most likely feared self: What can you do to make sure this does not happen?
Most feared self: What can you do to avoid this?
Explore each hope and fear
Also ask what can you do next week? Next month? Next year? Who can help with this?
Step 7. Overall Impressions, Thoughts and Feedback
Participants can reflect on these questions during the debrief of the overview map:
What did you learn about yourself from this interview?
What surprised you?
Think about your most important hoped-for selves – how would your life be if these came true?
What other activities could you engage in to help bring about (or avoid) your most important possible selves
What resources and supports do you think you might need to achieve your most important possible selves or avoid your feared selves?
Additional points
Encourage clients to look at the big picture of their lives and not just a future career or job – family, personal values, relationships, interests, etc.
Allow time for clients to reflect on choices, brainstorm arrangement, and overall map – many important insights come up at this time
Possible Selves Mapping Applications
Use PS Mapping to collect information about client interests and values, to develop short and long- term plans, & to evaluate, monitor, and refine plans
With a few adaptations, Possible Selves Mapping can be used in a group setting and in workshops
Possible selves maps can help develop resiliency in clients. The ability to self-appraise, realistically evaluate capacity for actions and expected outcomes, actively problem solve, change perspectives, and have self-knowledge are valuable resources clients can develop through reflection
Policy and program applications in work & education
References
Arnett, J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. US: Oxford University Press.
Blustein, D. (2006). The psychology of working: A new perspective for career development & public policy. NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Pub.
Chambers, E. (2003). Applied ethnography. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Collecting & Interpreting Qualitative Materials (2nd edition) , pp. 389-418. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
Lent, R., Hackett, G. & Brown, S. (1999). A social cognitive view of school to work transition. Career Dev. Quarterly, 47, 297-311.
Markus, H. & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
Marshall, A. & Guenette, F. (2008). Possible selves mapping process. (DVD & manual). Unpublished material. University of Victoria, BC.
Pedersen, P. (1991). Multiculturalism as a generic approach to counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 6-12.
Savickas, M. (1995). Consructivist counseling for career indecision.Career Development Quarterly, 43, 363-374.